There’s a peculiar pattern that emerges once you’ve spent enough time observing how people and organisations operate. The ones who broadcast their virtue the loudest, who wrap themselves in the language of kindness and care, are often the very ones engaged in the most calculated self-interest beneath that carefully maintained veneer.
It’s a paradox that feels almost counterintuitive at first. Surely those who speak most about doing good must be, well, good? But scratch the surface, and you’ll often find something far more concerning: a sophisticated form of exploitation dressed in the clothes of compassion.
The Performance of Virtue
The key word here is performance. Genuinely kind people rarely need to announce their kindness; it simply flows from their actions. But when niceness becomes a brand, when caring becomes content, when empathy transforms into a marketing strategy, something fundamental has shifted.
There are several reasons this pattern is so effective, and so prevalent.
First, niceness disarms criticism. When an organisation or individual has invested heavily in appearing kind, compassionate and progressive, calling out their exploitative behaviour becomes significantly harder. You’re not just challenging their actions; you’re challenging their carefully constructed identity. Push back, and you risk being painted as cynical, ungrateful or simply unable to recognise genuine good intentions when you see them.
Second, the performance of virtue creates moral debt. When someone or something appears exceptionally nice, we feel obligated to reciprocate, to give them the benefit of the doubt, to overlook small transgressions. This asymmetry creates space for exploitation. The nicer they appear, the more we’re willing to tolerate.
Third, surface level niceness is cheap. It costs nothing to use warm language, to adopt the aesthetics of care, to speak in the vocabulary of empathy. Actually treating people well, paying them fairly, creating genuinely supportive structures; these things are expensive.
The Corporate Manifestation
Nowhere is this paradox more visible than in corporate culture. The tech company that offers meditation rooms and speaks constantly about mental health whilst engineering its products to be maximally addictive and socially corrosive. The retail brand that positions itself as empowering and inclusive whilst relying on supply chains built on poverty wages and unsafe conditions. The startup that talks endlessly about its “family culture” whilst demanding unsustainable hours and offering no job security.
In each case, the niceness serves a function. It attracts talent who want to feel good about where they work. It generates positive press. It creates a buffer against criticism. And most importantly, it obscures the fundamental nature of the relationship: one of extraction and exploitation.
The Personal Version
This dynamic isn’t limited to organisations. We’ve all encountered individuals who operate according to this pattern. The colleague who’s unfailingly pleasant in person but ruthlessly undermines others behind the scenes. The friend who speaks constantly about emotional intelligence and healthy boundaries whilst consistently violating yours. The manager who positions themselves as a mentor and advocate whilst taking credit for your work and blocking your advancement.
What makes these individuals particularly difficult to navigate is that their niceness isn’t entirely fake. They often genuinely believe in the persona they’ve constructed. The cognitive dissonance between their self-image and their behaviour is resolved not through self-reflection but through increasingly elaborate justifications.
Why Authentically Kind People Are Different
The contrast with genuinely kind people and organisations is instructive. Authentic kindness tends to be quieter, more consistent and less performative. It doesn’t announce itself; it simply is.
Genuinely kind organisations don’t need to constantly tell you about their values because those values are embedded in their structures. They pay people fairly. They create genuine pathways for development. They distribute power rather than hoarding it.
Genuinely kind individuals operate similarly. Their care for others is evident in small, consistent actions rather than grand gestures. They don’t need to constantly position themselves as empathetic because their empathy is simply how they move through the world.
Breaking the Pattern
Recognising this paradox is the first step to protecting yourself from it. When you encounter exceptional niceness, particularly from those with power over you, treat it as a signal to look more carefully rather than less. Ask yourself: what material conditions underpin this relationship? Beyond the warm words and friendly gestures, how am I actually being treated? What am I being asked to accept or overlook?
Trust behaviour over branding. Trust patterns over individual moments. Trust the gap between what’s said and what’s done, between the values proclaimed and the structures maintained.
And perhaps most importantly, be wary of your own capacity for this pattern. It’s easy to point it out in others whilst remaining blind to the ways we might deploy niceness to avoid accountability, to smooth over exploitation, to maintain advantages we’re uncomfortable acknowledging.
In the end, genuine goodness doesn’t need to announce itself. It simply shows up, consistently, in ways that materially improve people’s lives. Everything else is just marketing.
Leave a Reply